Regardless of where a company is headquartered, it likely contracts with one or more independent contractors who live or work in New York City. If your company does so, take note. Earlier today, November 16, 2016, Mayor de Blasio signed into law the Freelance Isn’t Free Act (No. 1017-2015
Richard Reibstein Esq.
As a leading practitioner of enhancing independent contractor compliance and defending against misclassification claims, Richard represents large and small companies in administrative and judicial matters across the country, in addition to his labor/employment and noncompete/trade secrets practices.
Trump’s Impact on Independent Contractor Misclassification: States will Likely Increase Enforcement After Feds Dial Down Theirs
In the past eight years, the Obama Administration has spearheaded enforcement initiatives on independent contractor misclassification through the U.S. Department of Labor and the IRS. That crackdown, however, seemed to be focused on the low-hanging fruit – companies that often had little or no defense to the claim that they…
October 2016 Independent Contractor Misclassification and Compliance News Update
My update for this past month is noteworthy for the fact that I report below on IC misclassification lawsuits plaguing some of the largest and most recognizable companies in the U.S. (like Uber, Amazon, and FedEx) as well as a small local business like a New York City yoga studio. …
Freelancers to Enjoy Fee Payment Protections in New York City, But Bill Passed by City Council Has Major Defects
On October 27, 2016, the New York City Council passed a bill, commonly referred to as the Freelance Isn’t Free Act (No. 1017-2015), which is likely to be signed by the Mayor shortly. It seeks to ensure that independent contractors providing services as individuals are offered a written…
New York’s Highest Court Issues IC-Friendly Ruling, Holding That Certain Yoga Teachers Are Valid Independent Contractors
Earlier today, October 25, 2016, the New York Court of Appeals issued an important decision on the issue of independent contractor status. The Court held that a group of yoga instructors working at a New York City yoga studio were not employees covered by the New York Unemployment Insurance Law…
Further IC Misclassification Wounds: FedEx’s Settlement Payments Nearing $500 Million
FedEx’s costs due to IC misclassification are approaching $500 million over the past year as a result of appellate court decisions that concluded that FedEx did not draft in a valid manner its IC agreement and internal policies governing Ground Division drivers. Last Friday, an Oregon federal judge approved a…
Ride-Sharing Companies and IC Misclassification in New York
The New York Times today reported that the New York State Department of Labor has found two Uber drivers as eligible for unemployment benefits after having rejected the company’s argument that the drivers are independent contractors. Uber has so far avoided any judicial determinations that its drivers are employees and…
September 2016 Independent Contractor Misclassification and Compliance News Update
The past month’s judicial and administrative activity in the area of IC misclassification reflects the wide range of industries facing these types of claims: communications; cleaning services; transportation and delivery services; adult entertainment; hospitality; construction; and television production of professional sporting events. Almost all of these are industries that I…
Lessons Unlearned: Franchise and Independent Contractor Agreements Can Be Kiss of Death
On September 21, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a stinging decision against commercial cleaning franchisor Jani-King, certifying a class action in an independent contractor (IC) misclassification case arising in the franchising context. Williams v. Jani-King of Philadelphia Inc., No. 15-2049 (3d Cir. Sept.…
August 2016 Independent Contractor Misclassification and Compliance News Update
This month’s news update includes four initiatives by the U.S. Department of Labor to combat IC misclassification. The first was the issuance of a new page on the DOL website called “Misclassification Mythbusters.” We critiqued the new DOL page in a blog post, pointing out that the DOL had…